AAZ v BBZ & Ors [2016] EWHC 3349 (Fam)
Judgment date: 20 December 2016
Related
TYB v CAR (Non-Disclosure) (No 2) [2025] EWFC 263 (B)
DDJ David Hodson. Final hearing concerning maintenance for wife in a case with serious non-disclosure.
BC v BC [2025] EWFC 236
Peel J. Save for four specific matters, parties cannot refer to what happened at the pFDR. The Financial Remedies Court – Primary Principles paragraph 8 issued by Mostyn J and HHJ Hess goes too far by saying that the court should be told that offers were made and that an was indication given.
Abigail Laura Williams v Andrew John Williams [2024] EWFC 275
Judgment date: 06 August 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/275
Final order of Moor J in financial remedy proceedings involving a husband who had continually breached court orders, failed to attend hearings, and provided unreliable and ‘demonstrably untrue’ evidence.
Background
H (56) and W (59) married in
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
TYB v CAR (Non-Disclosure) (No 2) [2025] EWFC 263 (B)
DDJ David Hodson. Final hearing concerning maintenance for wife in a case with serious non-disclosure.
BC v BC [2025] EWFC 236
Peel J. Save for four specific matters, parties cannot refer to what happened at the pFDR. The Financial Remedies Court – Primary Principles paragraph 8 issued by Mostyn J and HHJ Hess goes too far by saying that the court should be told that offers were made and that an was indication given.
Abigail Laura Williams v Andrew John Williams [2024] EWFC 275
Judgment date: 06 August 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/275
Final order of Moor J in financial remedy proceedings involving a husband who had continually breached court orders, failed to attend hearings, and provided unreliable and ‘demonstrably untrue’ evidence.
Background
H (56) and W (59) married in
Latest
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)
Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.
The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know
Watch the recording of ‘The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know’, first broadcast on Wednesday 6th May 2026 with the authors of the new FRC Guide - HHJ Edward Hess, Nicholas Allen KC, Michael Allum, Lily Mottahedan and Rhys Taylor
Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality
The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.