Doweck v Doweck [2026] EWFC 238 (B) 4 August 2026. DJ Hammond. The court was concerned with an application for committal by W to commit H to prison.
CA v UK [2025] EWFC 117 (B) Judgment date: 10 January 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/117 HHJ Watkins. A substantive application by the father for a child maintenance order under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 (‘Schedule 1’); [12]. Within the application, the main issue concerned the most suitable jurisdiction for
VTY v GDB [2025] EWFC 110 (B) Judgment date: 24 April 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/110 Recorder Taylor. Final hearing in a financial remedy application which concerned issues of non-disclosure and allegations of asset concealment in different countries. The matter also involved foreign litigation which appeared to undermine the existing proceedings in
GH v IH [2025] EWFC 120 (B) Judgment date: 10 April 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/120 District Judge Hatvany. Final hearing on enforcement and variation of 2012 financial remedy order. The primary issue to be determined was the enforcement and variation of a joint lives periodical payments order made in 2012. The
Re CB (Financial Remedies: Antisuit Injunction) [2025] EWHC 427 (Fam) Judgment date: 25 February 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2025/427 HHJ Moradifar. Application by the husband for an anti-suit injunction to prevent the wife from pursuing, participating or otherwise continuing any applications for periodical payments for the children of the family or any other applications relating
RI v NG [2025] EWFC 9 (B) Judgment date: 07 January 2025 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/9 DJ Ashworth. Background The parties agreed to marry in February 2024 and the wedding was scheduled to take place on 15 May 2024, but was later called off on 30 April 2024. As a result of
MB v CD [2024] EWHC 751 (Fam) Judgment date: 02 April 2024 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/751 Judd J. This case concerned an application by the mother for a legal services payment order (LSPO) in respect of both financial remedy and Children Act 1989 proceedings. The mother sought an LSPO amounting to £143,