Kay Firth-Butterfield
Kay Firth-Butterfield is CEO at Good Tech Advisory, a TIME 100 Impact Awardee 2024, former Head of AI at the World Economic Forum and the world’s first Chief AI Ethics Officer. Kay was previously a family law barrister.
Related

Amelia Wellington
Amelia Wellington is an Associate at Hughes Fowler Carruthers. Amelia advises on all areas of family law arising from the breakdown of a marriage including divorce, financial remedy proceedings and private law children matters. She also advises on pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements.

George Williamson
Founder and CEO of Level.

Tim Amos KC
Tim Amos is a barrister in international family law and formerly Head of Chambers at QEB (Queen Elizabeth Building): 2018–23. He has practised at QEB since 1988 and took silk in 2008 as QC (now KC). His practice spans all aspects of family law (including pre-nups and nuptial trusts)
Read the journal


Financial Remedies Journal – 2025 Issue 2 | Summer
Related

Amelia Wellington
Amelia Wellington is an Associate at Hughes Fowler Carruthers. Amelia advises on all areas of family law arising from the breakdown of a marriage including divorce, financial remedy proceedings and private law children matters. She also advises on pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements.

George Williamson
Founder and CEO of Level.

Tim Amos KC
Tim Amos is a barrister in international family law and formerly Head of Chambers at QEB (Queen Elizabeth Building): 2018–23. He has practised at QEB since 1988 and took silk in 2008 as QC (now KC). His practice spans all aspects of family law (including pre-nups and nuptial trusts)
Latest

In Defence of Legal Fee Loans: The Economics of Access to Justice
The recent High Court judgment of Peel J in 𝘚𝘪𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘷 𝘓𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭 [2025] EWFC 89 has renewed focus on the role of legal fee lending in family proceedings. This coincides with significant judicial commentary about funding arrangements, including notable judgments in 𝘋𝘚𝘋 𝘷 𝘔𝘑𝘞 and 𝘓𝘐 𝘷 𝘍𝘛.
Final Reflections on Standish: Was It All Worthwhile?
If asked, Mr Standish may say that three rounds of litigation, with another to follow, were worth it – Mrs Standish, perhaps not. But for lawyers, with many questions left unanswered, and a feeling that the opportunity to settle the law on matrimonialisation with clarity and certainty has passed us by,

OS v DT and Post-Separation Income: Fairness Trumps Inflexibility
In ‘Post-Separation Income: Has Rossi Survived Waggott and Standish?’ (5 February 2025), Nicholas Allen KC considered the potential impact of Waggott v Waggott [2018] 2 FLR 406 on the argument that income (or the assets or capital generated therefrom) earned in or referable to the first 12 months post-separation should