Chai v Peng [2014] EWHC 750 (Fam)
Judgment date: 13 March 2014
Related
OO v QQ [2025] EWFC 310 (B)
HHJ Hyde KC. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The husband had failed to engage with most of the process. The case was determined on a needs basis given the wife’s terminal cancer diagnosis.
LMZ v AMZ [2024] EWFC 28
Judgment date: 12 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/28
Moor J. A striking age difference, 48 years between the parties, gives rise to a strong needs-based claim.
Background
* Both parties were born in Iraq and married in September 1999. At that time, H was 68 and
BN v MA [2013] EWHC 4250 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 December 2013
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2013/4250.html
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
OO v QQ [2025] EWFC 310 (B)
HHJ Hyde KC. Final hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The husband had failed to engage with most of the process. The case was determined on a needs basis given the wife’s terminal cancer diagnosis.
LMZ v AMZ [2024] EWFC 28
Judgment date: 12 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/28
Moor J. A striking age difference, 48 years between the parties, gives rise to a strong needs-based claim.
Background
* Both parties were born in Iraq and married in September 1999. At that time, H was 68 and
BN v MA [2013] EWHC 4250 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 December 2013
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2013/4250.html
Latest
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)
Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.
The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know
Watch the recording of ‘The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know’, first broadcast on Wednesday 6th May 2026 with the authors of the new FRC Guide - HHJ Edward Hess, Nicholas Allen KC, Michael Allum, Lily Mottahedan and Rhys Taylor
Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality
The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.