national archives Relief From Sanctions Enforcement Open in JC v MC [2026] EWFC 145 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2026/145 JC v MC - Find Case Law - The National ArchivesThe National Archives home pageMR JUSTICE MACDONALD Related Xydhias and Its Limits: HA v EN and THR v WAT This article aims to highlight some of the inherent issues presented by the concept of Xydhias agreements, namely the residual discretion that is left to the court to approve or alter those agreements, and the practical problems that result from this. F v EE (Enforcement under Sch 1 CA : s423 Insolvency Act 1986) [2026] EWFC 249 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/249 Uncertain Futures in Pensions Enforcement – What happened to Blight v Brewster? [2026] 2 FRJ 132. The remedy in Blight v Brewster has been partially overridden by the decision in Manolete Partners Plc v White. While the original remedy appears to remain in existence, it seems to be no longer an attractive method of enforcement. Read the journal Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 2 | Summer Open in Related Xydhias and Its Limits: HA v EN and THR v WAT This article aims to highlight some of the inherent issues presented by the concept of Xydhias agreements, namely the residual discretion that is left to the court to approve or alter those agreements, and the practical problems that result from this. F v EE (Enforcement under Sch 1 CA : s423 Insolvency Act 1986) [2026] EWFC 249 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/249 Uncertain Futures in Pensions Enforcement – What happened to Blight v Brewster? [2026] 2 FRJ 132. The remedy in Blight v Brewster has been partially overridden by the decision in Manolete Partners Plc v White. While the original remedy appears to remain in existence, it seems to be no longer an attractive method of enforcement. Latest Xydhias and Its Limits: HA v EN and THR v WAT This article aims to highlight some of the inherent issues presented by the concept of Xydhias agreements, namely the residual discretion that is left to the court to approve or alter those agreements, and the practical problems that result from this. Obligations, Responsibilities and the One-Liner The law in England and Wales is under scrutiny and may well be changed. There are discussions about the extent to which the welfare of children should be the primary or paramount consideration. Whatever we might think of that, do we not need to look again at obligations and responsibilities? A Fairer End to Relationships? What the Reform Debate Tells Us about Families, Fairness and the Future of Separation Law – A Personal Review of the Responses from a Part-time Judge and Hybrid Mediator This article focuses on the responses of four well-respected organisations to the government's A Fairer End consultation: Rights of Women, the Family Solutions Group, Resolution and the Family Law Bar Association. is curated by The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS
Xydhias and Its Limits: HA v EN and THR v WAT This article aims to highlight some of the inherent issues presented by the concept of Xydhias agreements, namely the residual discretion that is left to the court to approve or alter those agreements, and the practical problems that result from this.
F v EE (Enforcement under Sch 1 CA : s423 Insolvency Act 1986) [2026] EWFC 249 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/249
Uncertain Futures in Pensions Enforcement – What happened to Blight v Brewster? [2026] 2 FRJ 132. The remedy in Blight v Brewster has been partially overridden by the decision in Manolete Partners Plc v White. While the original remedy appears to remain in existence, it seems to be no longer an attractive method of enforcement.
Xydhias and Its Limits: HA v EN and THR v WAT This article aims to highlight some of the inherent issues presented by the concept of Xydhias agreements, namely the residual discretion that is left to the court to approve or alter those agreements, and the practical problems that result from this.
F v EE (Enforcement under Sch 1 CA : s423 Insolvency Act 1986) [2026] EWFC 249 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/249
Uncertain Futures in Pensions Enforcement – What happened to Blight v Brewster? [2026] 2 FRJ 132. The remedy in Blight v Brewster has been partially overridden by the decision in Manolete Partners Plc v White. While the original remedy appears to remain in existence, it seems to be no longer an attractive method of enforcement.
Xydhias and Its Limits: HA v EN and THR v WAT This article aims to highlight some of the inherent issues presented by the concept of Xydhias agreements, namely the residual discretion that is left to the court to approve or alter those agreements, and the practical problems that result from this.
Obligations, Responsibilities and the One-Liner The law in England and Wales is under scrutiny and may well be changed. There are discussions about the extent to which the welfare of children should be the primary or paramount consideration. Whatever we might think of that, do we not need to look again at obligations and responsibilities?
A Fairer End to Relationships? What the Reform Debate Tells Us about Families, Fairness and the Future of Separation Law – A Personal Review of the Responses from a Part-time Judge and Hybrid Mediator This article focuses on the responses of four well-respected organisations to the government's A Fairer End consultation: Rights of Women, the Family Solutions Group, Resolution and the Family Law Bar Association.