Ramana v Kist-Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2025/1022?court=ewca%2Fciv&court=ewca%2Fcrim&court=ewhc%2Ffam&court=ewfc
Court of Appeal (Moylan LJ)
Related
Ferrucio Ferrara v Caroline Frances Ferrara [2026] EWCA Civ 512
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/512?query=Ferrucio+Ferrara+Caroline+Frances+Ferrara+%5B2026%5D+EWCA+Civ+512
Delaying Departure? Domicile in Divorce Cases
[2026] 1 FRJ 16. In Ramana v Kist Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022, [2025] 4 WLR 120 the Court of Appeal was concerned with the question of how a domicile of choice may be lost. This article explores the arguments made at the hearing, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the likely implications.
The End of the Non-Dom Tax Status: Time Now to End Family Law Domicile Jurisdiction
Overview
Domicile has been a fundamental basis of jurisdiction in English law including English family law. But it is intrinsically backward-looking, archaic in its concepts, thoroughly unknown or at best misunderstood by the population, differently defined abroad and at odds with many other countries including the EU. With the non-domicile
Related
Ferrucio Ferrara v Caroline Frances Ferrara [2026] EWCA Civ 512
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/512?query=Ferrucio+Ferrara+Caroline+Frances+Ferrara+%5B2026%5D+EWCA+Civ+512
Delaying Departure? Domicile in Divorce Cases
[2026] 1 FRJ 16. In Ramana v Kist Ramana [2025] EWCA Civ 1022, [2025] 4 WLR 120 the Court of Appeal was concerned with the question of how a domicile of choice may be lost. This article explores the arguments made at the hearing, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the likely implications.
The End of the Non-Dom Tax Status: Time Now to End Family Law Domicile Jurisdiction
Overview
Domicile has been a fundamental basis of jurisdiction in English law including English family law. But it is intrinsically backward-looking, archaic in its concepts, thoroughly unknown or at best misunderstood by the population, differently defined abroad and at odds with many other countries including the EU. With the non-domicile
Latest
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)
Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.
The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know
Watch the recording of ‘The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know’, first broadcast on Wednesday 6th May 2026 with the authors of the new FRC Guide - HHJ Edward Hess, Nicholas Allen KC, Michael Allum, Lily Mottahedan and Rhys Taylor
Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality
The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.