Robert v Woodall [2016] EWHC 2987 (Ch)
Judgment date: 25 November 2016
Related
DDR v BDR (Financial Remedies, Beneficial Ownership and Insolvency) [2024] EWFC 278
Judgment date: 08 October 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/278
Alexander Chandler KC sitting as a High Court Judge. A complicated case, involving a consideration of three areas of law: insolvency, trusts of land, and financial remedies. Useful analysis of how the courts address the tension between
Till Debt Do Us Part: Bankruptcy and Financial Remedies
Financial remedies practitioners are well-accustomed to advising parties in straitened financial circumstances. Often the central question is how to stretch the available resources to ensure both parties have a roof over their heads. However, when one or both parties find themselves in serious financial difficulty, a less familiar issue may
Gudmundsson v Lin [2024] EWHC 1576 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 June 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/1576
Peel J does his best to put into practice the intention of the original financial remedies order, despite H depriving W of 50% of the FMH by not informing the court that there was a bankruptcy
Related
DDR v BDR (Financial Remedies, Beneficial Ownership and Insolvency) [2024] EWFC 278
Judgment date: 08 October 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/278
Alexander Chandler KC sitting as a High Court Judge. A complicated case, involving a consideration of three areas of law: insolvency, trusts of land, and financial remedies. Useful analysis of how the courts address the tension between
Till Debt Do Us Part: Bankruptcy and Financial Remedies
Financial remedies practitioners are well-accustomed to advising parties in straitened financial circumstances. Often the central question is how to stretch the available resources to ensure both parties have a roof over their heads. However, when one or both parties find themselves in serious financial difficulty, a less familiar issue may
Gudmundsson v Lin [2024] EWHC 1576 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 June 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/1576
Peel J does his best to put into practice the intention of the original financial remedies order, despite H depriving W of 50% of the FMH by not informing the court that there was a bankruptcy
Latest
Promises Unkept: Unpaid Child Maintenance and the Price of Inaction
Unpaid child maintenance remains one of the most persistent and under-addressed financial injustices affecting separated families in England and Wales. The failures of the CMS destabilise the very integrity of financial provision for children post-separation.
Finality and Funding: a Further Thought on CC v UU Concerning the Availability of LSPOs for Enforcement Proceedings
In the case of CC v UU, concerning post-final order LSPOs, did Peel J fall into error? Should the judgment have been decided differently?
She Who Laughs Last? Pets, Perpetuities, and Other Problems with the Last Will and Testament of Taylor A. Swift.
Taylor Swift's 'Anti-Hero' may be the only pop song to feature a contentious probate dispute. This article considers the drafting problems of Taylor Swift's Will from the perspective of the law of England and Wales.