Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/uksc/2025/26
Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Burrows, Lord Stephens, Lady Simler.
Standish v Standish - Find Case Law - The National Archives
Related
The Doctrine of Matrimonialisation post-Standish: Three Causes for Concern
[2026] 1 FRJ 61. The Supreme Court decision in Standish has significantly clarified the law of matrimonialisation – the circumstances under which property that is presumed to fall outside the bounds of the marital partnership is deemed matrimonial for the purposes of financial remedies applications.
A Critical Take on Standish
The case of Standish was all about the correct approach to be taken to the concept of ‘matrimonialisation’. This article deals with one question: whether the ‘new test’ announced by the Supreme Court is worse than the ‘old test’ enunciated by the Court of Appeal at the prior stage of proceedings.
Final Reflections on Standish: Was It All Worthwhile?
If asked, Mr Standish may say that three rounds of litigation, with another to follow, were worth it – Mrs Standish, perhaps not. But with many questions left unanswered, and many new questions arising, there is an unshakeable feeling that this was an opportunity missed.
Mr and Mrs Standish have become
Related
The Doctrine of Matrimonialisation post-Standish: Three Causes for Concern
[2026] 1 FRJ 61. The Supreme Court decision in Standish has significantly clarified the law of matrimonialisation – the circumstances under which property that is presumed to fall outside the bounds of the marital partnership is deemed matrimonial for the purposes of financial remedies applications.
A Critical Take on Standish
The case of Standish was all about the correct approach to be taken to the concept of ‘matrimonialisation’. This article deals with one question: whether the ‘new test’ announced by the Supreme Court is worse than the ‘old test’ enunciated by the Court of Appeal at the prior stage of proceedings.
Final Reflections on Standish: Was It All Worthwhile?
If asked, Mr Standish may say that three rounds of litigation, with another to follow, were worth it – Mrs Standish, perhaps not. But with many questions left unanswered, and many new questions arising, there is an unshakeable feeling that this was an opportunity missed.
Mr and Mrs Standish have become
Latest
Beyond Thing 1 and Thing 2: Cryptoassets and the New Property Landscape
For almost 140 years, bright-eyed law students have been taught that the world of personal property contains only two species of thing: those which can be physically held, and those which can be enforced. Cryptoassets forced the issue.
Now out: Financial Remedies Journal 2026 Issue 1 (Spring 2026)
The new issue of the Financial Remedies Journal is now available.
Stop! In the Name of the LSA: Why Your Favourite Legal Exec Can’t Touch That Form A after Mazur and XX v GH
HHJ Farquhar was confronted with the practical consequences of Mazur for family law cases. The issue arose when Family Law Partners, a highly respected specialist family law firm, sought an exemption permitting their senior Chartered Legal Executive, Ms Lisa Burton Durham, to conduct litigation.