TW and TM (Minors) [2015] EWHC 3054 (Fam)
Judgment date: 24 July 2015
Related
GH v H [2024] EWHC 2869 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 November 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/2869
Mr Simon Colton KC sitting as a deputy High Court judge.
Summary
On W’s application, an interim changing order was made final in respect of sums to be paid to a third party/child of
TW v GC [2024] EWHC 949 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/949
This was an appeal of a final order in financial remedy proceedings heard by Mr Justice Cusworth. The appeal argued that HHJ Furness KC at first instance had pitched W’s needs at too high a
D v D [2024] EWFC 76
Judgment date: 12 March 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/76
HHJ Booth, sitting as a judge of the High Court: 25:75 division in favour of H following breakdown of second marriage and H’s substantial assets. Court considered W’s needs should be generously interpreted to
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
GH v H [2024] EWHC 2869 (Fam)
Judgment date: 12 November 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/2869
Mr Simon Colton KC sitting as a deputy High Court judge.
Summary
On W’s application, an interim changing order was made final in respect of sums to be paid to a third party/child of
TW v GC [2024] EWHC 949 (Fam)
Judgment date: 21 February 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/949
This was an appeal of a final order in financial remedy proceedings heard by Mr Justice Cusworth. The appeal argued that HHJ Furness KC at first instance had pitched W’s needs at too high a
D v D [2024] EWFC 76
Judgment date: 12 March 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2024/76
HHJ Booth, sitting as a judge of the High Court: 25:75 division in favour of H following breakdown of second marriage and H’s substantial assets. Court considered W’s needs should be generously interpreted to
Latest
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)
Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.
The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know
Watch the recording of ‘The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know’, first broadcast on Wednesday 6th May 2026 with the authors of the new FRC Guide - HHJ Edward Hess, Nicholas Allen KC, Michael Allum, Lily Mottahedan and Rhys Taylor
Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality
The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.