Work v Gray [2016] EWHC 562 (Fam)
Judgment date: 15 February 2016
Related
Michael v Michael (No. 3) [2025] EWFC 245
HHJ Hess, sitting as a DHCJ, addressing business valuations in a financial remedy final hearing.
CMS Liability Orders and Appeals Against Liability Orders Made in the Magistrates' Court
Over the course of the last few years, I have dealt with a number of appeals against the making of liability orders and have published a couple of judgments where I think points have arisen which others may benefit from seeing how I have dealt with them. It is my
SS v NS (Spousal Maintenance) [2014] EWHC 4183 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 December 2014
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/4183.html
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
Michael v Michael (No. 3) [2025] EWFC 245
HHJ Hess, sitting as a DHCJ, addressing business valuations in a financial remedy final hearing.
CMS Liability Orders and Appeals Against Liability Orders Made in the Magistrates' Court
Over the course of the last few years, I have dealt with a number of appeals against the making of liability orders and have published a couple of judgments where I think points have arisen which others may benefit from seeing how I have dealt with them. It is my
SS v NS (Spousal Maintenance) [2014] EWHC 4183 (Fam)
Judgment date: 10 December 2014
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/4183.html
Latest
Beyond Thing 1 and Thing 2: Cryptoassets and the New Property Landscape
For almost 140 years, bright-eyed law students have been taught that the world of personal property contains only two species of thing: those which can be physically held, and those which can be enforced. Cryptoassets forced the issue.
Now out: Financial Remedies Journal 2026 Issue 1 (Spring 2026)
The new issue of the Financial Remedies Journal is now available.
Stop! In the Name of the LSA: Why Your Favourite Legal Exec Can’t Touch That Form A after Mazur and XX v GH
HHJ Farquhar was confronted with the practical consequences of Mazur for family law cases. The issue arose when Family Law Partners, a highly respected specialist family law firm, sought an exemption permitting their senior Chartered Legal Executive, Ms Lisa Burton Durham, to conduct litigation.