BD v FD (Financial Remedies: Needs) [2016] EWHC 594 (Fam)

Judgment date: 17 March 2016

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2016/594.html

Related

Wei-Lyn Loh v Ardal Loh-Gronager [2025] EWFC 483

Cusworth J. Sums the husband unilaterally removed from a mortgage account and joint bank accounts during the marriage are held to be part of his entitlement under a pre-nuptial agreement, partially due to conduct findings.

Needs Must as the Devil Drives: An Analysis of Pension Sharing in Needs Cases

[2026] 1 FRJ 43. Despite PAG1 and W v H [2020] EWFC B10 stressing the importance of treating a case on its own facts, somehow a view developed that pensions should inevitably be divided to achieve equality of income in all ‘needs’ cases. The source is unclear, but it’s worth starting with PAG1.

All Change or More of the Same? Housing Needs and Notional Property Down Under in light of Amendments to the Family Law Act 1975

[2026] 1 FRJ 55. Considering two aspects of the 2025 amendments to the Australian Family Law Act 1975: the greater recognition given to the needs of a party who has the care of a child to provide housing, and the removal of notional property or addbacks in the balance sheet in property division.

Read the journal

Related

Wei-Lyn Loh v Ardal Loh-Gronager [2025] EWFC 483

Cusworth J. Sums the husband unilaterally removed from a mortgage account and joint bank accounts during the marriage are held to be part of his entitlement under a pre-nuptial agreement, partially due to conduct findings.

Needs Must as the Devil Drives: An Analysis of Pension Sharing in Needs Cases

[2026] 1 FRJ 43. Despite PAG1 and W v H [2020] EWFC B10 stressing the importance of treating a case on its own facts, somehow a view developed that pensions should inevitably be divided to achieve equality of income in all ‘needs’ cases. The source is unclear, but it’s worth starting with PAG1.

All Change or More of the Same? Housing Needs and Notional Property Down Under in light of Amendments to the Family Law Act 1975

[2026] 1 FRJ 55. Considering two aspects of the 2025 amendments to the Australian Family Law Act 1975: the greater recognition given to the needs of a party who has the care of a child to provide housing, and the removal of notional property or addbacks in the balance sheet in property division.

Latest

The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)

The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)

Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.

The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know

The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know

Watch the recording of ‘The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know’, first broadcast on Wednesday 6th May 2026 with the authors of the new FRC Guide - HHJ Edward Hess, Nicholas Allen KC, Michael Allum, Lily Mottahedan and Rhys Taylor

Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality

Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality

The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS