Brooks v Brooks [1996] AC 375
Judgment date: 29 June 1995
Related
HO v TL [2023] EWFC 215
Judgment date: 01 December 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/215
Peel J. Final hearing. Guidance on factors relevant to valuing a private company; accessibility of extricating money from trusts per Charman; and extent of matrimonialisation of H’s extra-marital financial contributions.
H aged 49. W aged 56
EK v DK & Ors [2023] EWHC 1829 (Fam)
Judgment date: 11 May 2023
https://assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1829/ewhc_fam_2023_1829.pdf
Mr Justice Francis. Application by W to set aside consent order dated March 2018 on basis of H’s non-disclosure.
This was a long marriage with three teenage/young adult
Rose v Rose & Ors [2022] EWFC 192
Judgment date: 25 November 2022
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/192.html
His Honour Judge Booth (sitting as a Judge of the High Court pursuant to s 9 SCA 1981).
How should the court ‘deal with a respondent husband who has been dishonest throughout, has failed
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
HO v TL [2023] EWFC 215
Judgment date: 01 December 2023
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2023/215
Peel J. Final hearing. Guidance on factors relevant to valuing a private company; accessibility of extricating money from trusts per Charman; and extent of matrimonialisation of H’s extra-marital financial contributions.
H aged 49. W aged 56
EK v DK & Ors [2023] EWHC 1829 (Fam)
Judgment date: 11 May 2023
https://assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2023/1829/ewhc_fam_2023_1829.pdf
Mr Justice Francis. Application by W to set aside consent order dated March 2018 on basis of H’s non-disclosure.
This was a long marriage with three teenage/young adult
Rose v Rose & Ors [2022] EWFC 192
Judgment date: 25 November 2022
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/192.html
His Honour Judge Booth (sitting as a Judge of the High Court pursuant to s 9 SCA 1981).
How should the court ‘deal with a respondent husband who has been dishonest throughout, has failed
Latest
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)
Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.
The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know
Watch the recording of ‘The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know’, first broadcast on Wednesday 6th May 2026 with the authors of the new FRC Guide - HHJ Edward Hess, Nicholas Allen KC, Michael Allum, Lily Mottahedan and Rhys Taylor
Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality
The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.