BT v CU [2021] EWFC 87

Judgment date: 01 November 2021

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2021/87.html

Related

P v M (Appeal: Unfair Hearing: Variation of Periodical Payments: Global Orders) [2026] EWHC 1330 (Fam)

Judgment date: 3 June 2026 Harrison J allows an appeal against a final order made by HHJ Wright, which varied a previous order made by DDJ Butler, which reduced periodical payments paid to W due to a change in H’s income.

K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B)

DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.

Rt. Hon. The Countess Karen Anne Spencer v Rt. Hon. Ninth Earl Spencer, Charles Edward Maurice Spencer [2025] EWFC 431

Peel J. Appeal by W for further details of an arbitration award to be disclosed to the associated KBD proceedings and to ‘any persons’. Peel J permitted minimal further disclosure in order to provide the King’s Bench court with full context but emphasised the confidential nature of arbitration.

Read the journal

Related

P v M (Appeal: Unfair Hearing: Variation of Periodical Payments: Global Orders) [2026] EWHC 1330 (Fam)

Judgment date: 3 June 2026 Harrison J allows an appeal against a final order made by HHJ Wright, which varied a previous order made by DDJ Butler, which reduced periodical payments paid to W due to a change in H’s income.

K v K [2026] EWFC 83 (B)

DJ Parker’s decision emphasises the importance of the court transcript where there is a dispute as to what was said by the judge. Ultimately H’s application to set aside a final order by consent failed because H was wrong; the FDR judge had not given him a 28-day cooling off period.

Rt. Hon. The Countess Karen Anne Spencer v Rt. Hon. Ninth Earl Spencer, Charles Edward Maurice Spencer [2025] EWFC 431

Peel J. Appeal by W for further details of an arbitration award to be disclosed to the associated KBD proceedings and to ‘any persons’. Peel J permitted minimal further disclosure in order to provide the King’s Bench court with full context but emphasised the confidential nature of arbitration.

Latest

Prioritising Children? Competing Principles in Financial Remedies Reform

Prioritising Children? Competing Principles in Financial Remedies Reform

‘A fairer end to relationships’ identifies four guiding principles, and these can pull in different directions. Whilst the consultation does not explain how the principles have been balanced with one another, such an analysis is essential to promote a coherent framework.

Assessment of Hierarchical Needs Under the Government’s Proposed Reforms

Assessment of Hierarchical Needs Under the Government’s Proposed Reforms

In an effort to introduce greater certainty, the Government has proposed a new hierarchical approach to be undertaken by the court when considering needs. The authors question whether, in practice, it will be easy to police such a distinction. Family lawyers are nothing if not creative.

‘A Fairer End to Relationships’: Government Proposals for Reform of Financial Remedies on Divorce and Cohabitation

‘A Fairer End to Relationships’: Government Proposals for Reform of Financial Remedies on Divorce and Cohabitation

For many years there have been strong movements to reform, improve and make clearer and more certain the law relating to financial outcomes on divorce. In early June 2026 the UK government produced a consultation paper with a very fast response date.

is curated by

The Leaders In Family Law Books & Software

EXPLORE OUR PRODUCTS