Ghassemian Hamily Sartipy (aka Hamila Sartipy v Tigris Industries Inc) [2019] EWCA Civ 225
Judgment date: 01 March 2019
Related
Galbraith-Marten v De Renee (Extension of Extended Civil Restraint Order) [2025] EWFC 96
Judgment date: 15 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/96
Cobb J. Application for an extension of an extended civil restraint order and an application for further financial orders within long-running financial remedy proceedings.
Facts
The parties had been engaged in litigation in England and Australia in
Duncan Needham v Susan Rosemary Ellis [2024] EWCC 29
Judgment date: 15 November 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewcc/2024/29
HHJ Tindal. An unusual case, involving two appeals arising from longstanding TLATA claims involving the former family home. Mr Needham’s application to vary the consent order which was made in 2017 was refused. He sought ‘permission
Renée v Galbraith-Marten [2022] EWFC 118
Judgment date: 04 October 2022
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2022/118
Mostyn J. F’s application for extension of extended civil restraint order (ECRO) and M’s application for permission pursuant to ECRO to bring a Schedule 1 application for a capitalised school fees order and variation of
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
Galbraith-Marten v De Renee (Extension of Extended Civil Restraint Order) [2025] EWFC 96
Judgment date: 15 April 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/96
Cobb J. Application for an extension of an extended civil restraint order and an application for further financial orders within long-running financial remedy proceedings.
Facts
The parties had been engaged in litigation in England and Australia in
Duncan Needham v Susan Rosemary Ellis [2024] EWCC 29
Judgment date: 15 November 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewcc/2024/29
HHJ Tindal. An unusual case, involving two appeals arising from longstanding TLATA claims involving the former family home. Mr Needham’s application to vary the consent order which was made in 2017 was refused. He sought ‘permission
Renée v Galbraith-Marten [2022] EWFC 118
Judgment date: 04 October 2022
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2022/118
Mostyn J. F’s application for extension of extended civil restraint order (ECRO) and M’s application for permission pursuant to ECRO to bring a Schedule 1 application for a capitalised school fees order and variation of
Latest
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)
Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.
The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know
Watch the recording of ‘The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know’, first broadcast on Wednesday 6th May 2026 with the authors of the new FRC Guide - HHJ Edward Hess, Nicholas Allen KC, Michael Allum, Lily Mottahedan and Rhys Taylor
Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality
The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.