Kicinski v Pardi [2021] EWHC 499
Judgment date: 05 March 2021
Related
AP v TP (Pension Enforcement) [2025] EWFC 190 (B)
Judgment date: 13 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/190
Summary
HHJ Farquhar. Application by husband (applicant) to set aside a pension sharing order (PSO) under the Thwaite jurisdiction due to the wife’s sustained non-compliance. The court held that continued enforcement of the PSO would
M v B [2025] EWFC 182
Judgment date: 25 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182
Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A.
The
Hersman v De Verchere [2024] EWHC 905 (Fam)
Judgment date: 19 April 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/905
Moor J. Enforcement proceedings following W’s failure to transfer a ski chalet to H. W previously committed to three months’ imprisonment but has not returned to the UK. H awarded £2.3m on account of
Read the journal
Financial Remedies Journal – 2026 Issue 1 | Spring
Related
AP v TP (Pension Enforcement) [2025] EWFC 190 (B)
Judgment date: 13 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2025/190
Summary
HHJ Farquhar. Application by husband (applicant) to set aside a pension sharing order (PSO) under the Thwaite jurisdiction due to the wife’s sustained non-compliance. The court held that continued enforcement of the PSO would
M v B [2025] EWFC 182
Judgment date: 25 June 2025
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2025/182
Sir Jonathan Cohen (sitting as a judge of the High Court). Financial remedy proceedings considering the court’s power to strike out applications under FPR 4.4, having regard to the effect of FPR 9.9A.
The
Hersman v De Verchere [2024] EWHC 905 (Fam)
Judgment date: 19 April 2024
https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/fam/2024/905
Moor J. Enforcement proceedings following W’s failure to transfer a ski chalet to H. W previously committed to three months’ imprisonment but has not returned to the UK. H awarded £2.3m on account of
Latest
The Curious Case of CA 1989 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(3)
Paragraph 1 of CA 1989 Schedule 1 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief against parents’. Paragraph 2 is headed ‘Orders for financial relief for persons over eighteen’. As recent cases have demonstrated this structure causes complications.
The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know
Watch the recording of ‘The 2026 FRC Guide: What Practitioners Need to Know’, first broadcast on Wednesday 6th May 2026 with the authors of the new FRC Guide - HHJ Edward Hess, Nicholas Allen KC, Michael Allum, Lily Mottahedan and Rhys Taylor
Mazur in the Court of Appeal: the Judgment That Saved Half the Profession from Accidental Criminality
The Court of Appeal rewrites the landscape of ‘conduct of litigation’ – Mazur & Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 369.