Matrimonialisation Sarah Jane Thirsk v Henry Stamford Thirsk & Ors [2026] EWHC 1501 (Ch) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2026/1501 19 Jun 2026
Hadkinson Orders Bartok v Brunner [2026] EWFC 146 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/2026/146 14 Jun 2026
Divorce Domicile McGregor v Smith (Domicile/Misuse of Divorce Portal) [2026] EWFC 128 (B) https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2026/128 06 Jun 2026
Journal Valuations Private Equity Expert Evidence Carried Interest Wells Sharing Keep Calm and Carry on: A v M in a Wells World [2026] 2 FRJ 114. This article takes a closer look at how Carry was shared in the cases of A v M and ED v AP, and the different approaches adopted for its assessment. It concludes by proposing an alternative method by which Carry can be shared when the timing of future receipts is unknown.
Journal 'Thwaite Jurisdiction' Variation of an Order Thwaite – The Jury Remains Out [2026] 2 FRJ 99. Does the Thwaite jurisdiction still exist? If it does, what is its appropriate scope? The Court of Appeal will be required to decide.
Journal Conduct Procedure Final Hearings Cross-examination in Financial Remedy Claims [2026] 2 FRJ 88. Cross-examination can have a material impact on the court’s findings of fact and determination of issues. This article is written for the occasional cross-examiner, as an aide mémoire of the rules, as a guide to doing the job well.
Nuptial Agreements A Fairer End? Gaps in the Government’s Nuptial Agreement Proposals On 5 June 2026, the Government published A Fairer End to Relationships, proposing comprehensive reform of the financial consequences of both divorce and separation for unmarried couples. This piece focuses on the Government’s plan to introduce binding qualifying nuptial agreements (QNAs).
Journal Add-Backs Conduct 50 Years on from Martin v Martin 1976 – Are Add-backs Fit for Purpose? [2026] 2 FRJ 94. Add-backs were a useful mechanism to prevent one party’s unilateral dissipation of assets which unfairly prejudiced the non-dissipating spouse’s share. But something has gone wrong when the outcomes deviate too far from what the average person considers fair.
Journal Compensation Financial Remedies Maybe Compensation Isn’t What You Think [2026] 2 FRJ 118. The compensation principle set out in Miller; McFarlane is the logical next step in ending discrimination between different but equal contributions. Compensation is a vehicle to alleviate post-divorce disparity, to give both spouses an equal start on the road to independent living.
P v M (Appeal: Unfair Hearing: Variation of Periodical Payments: Global Orders) [2026] EWHC 1330 (Fam)